Glossary
- Abstract Syntax
- Abstraction
- Behavioral Modeling
- Blended Modeling
- Code Generation
- Concrete Syntax
- Constraints
- Domain-Specific Language (DSL)
- EMF/Ecore
- Executable Model
- Executable UML (xUML)
- Flexible Modeling
- Metamodel
- Meta Object Facility (MOF)
- Metamodeling Language
- Model-Driven Architecture (MDA)
- Model Transformation
- Model Validation
- Model Simulation
- Multi-view Modeling
- Platform-Independent Model (PIM)
- Platform-Specific Model (PSM)
- Positional Notation
- Projectional Editing
- Refactoring
- Refinement
- Round-Trip Engineering
- Syntactic Sugar
- Topological Notation
- Traceability
- Transformation Language
- Unified Modeling Language (UML)
- Viewpoint
- Workbench
- Team & Partners
- Video Tutorials
- Privacy Policy
- Cookie Policy
- Single Page (eg Policy)
- Teaching
- User Guide
- Cloud & Reactiveness
- What’s new
- Higher Visual Capabilities
- Real-time Collaboration
- LSP/GLSP vs. Jjodel
- EMF vs. Jjolde
- Jjodel Cookbool
- Co-Evolution Capabilities in Jjodel, EMF/Sirius, and MetaEdit+
- Where Jjodel is adopted?
- Student Survey
- Roadmap
- JSX for Model Navigation
- Abstract Syntax
- Abstraction
- Behavioral Modeling
- Blended Modeling
- Code Generation
- Concrete Syntax
- Constraints
- Domain-Specific Language (DSL)
- EMF/Ecore
- Executable Model
- Executable UML (xUML)
- Flexible Modeling
- Metamodel
- Meta Object Facility (MOF)
- Metamodeling Language
- Model-Driven Architecture (MDA)
- Model Transformation
- Model Validation
- Model Simulation
- Multi-view Modeling
- Platform-Independent Model (PIM)
- Platform-Specific Model (PSM)
- Positional Notation
- Projectional Editing
- Refactoring
- Refinement
- Round-Trip Engineering
- Syntactic Sugar
- Topological Notation
- Traceability
- Transformation Language
- Unified Modeling Language (UML)
- Viewpoint
- Workbench
- Team & Partners
- Video Tutorials
- Privacy Policy
- Cookie Policy
- Single Page (eg Policy)
- Teaching
- User Guide
- Cloud & Reactiveness
- What’s new
- Higher Visual Capabilities
- Real-time Collaboration
- LSP/GLSP vs. Jjodel
- EMF vs. Jjolde
- Jjodel Cookbool
- Co-Evolution Capabilities in Jjodel, EMF/Sirius, and MetaEdit+
- Where Jjodel is adopted?
- Student Survey
- Roadmap
- JSX for Model Navigation
Abstract Syntax
Abstract syntax is the formal structure that defines the elements and rules for constructing valid models within a modeling language. It represents the conceptual essence of a language, independent of any specific notation or representation used to visualize or serialize the models. Abstract syntax focuses on the logical organization and relationships of the language’s constructs rather than their graphical or textual appearance.
In Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), abstract syntax and metamodels are closely related concepts, where the metamodel defines the abstract syntax of a modeling language.
Characterization
- Elements and Constructs
- Classes/Types: The fundamental building blocks of the model, representing entities, concepts, or components within the domain.
- Attributes/Properties: Characteristics or properties of the elements that define their state or configuration.
- Relationships/Association: Connections between elements that define how they interact or are related within the model, such as associations, dependencies, or compositions.
- Rules and Constraints
- Syntax Rules: Define the valid ways in which elements can be combined and structured to form a coherent model. These rules ensure that the model adheres to the language’s intended design and semantics.
- Semantic Constraints: Additional conditions that specify the meaningful relationships and interactions between elements, often expressed using invariants, preconditions, and postconditions.
- Metamodeling
- Metamodel: A model that defines the abstract syntax of a modeling language. The metamodel specifies the language’s constructs, their properties, and the rules for their combination. It serves as a blueprint for creating specific models within that language.
- Meta-Object Facility (MOF): A standard framework for defining metamodels, used extensively in MDE to provide a consistent approach to specifying abstract syntax.
- EMF/Ecore: The core metamodeling language of the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF). It provides the foundational constructs and mechanisms for defining models and metamodels within the EMF ecosystem. Essentially, Ecore is to EMF what the Meta-Object Facility (MOF) is to the Object Management Group (OMG).
- Independence from Concrete Syntax
- Separation of Concerns: Abstract syntax is distinct from concrete syntax, which deals with how models are represented visually or textually. This separation allows the same abstract syntax to be represented in multiple ways, such as different diagrammatic notations or textual formats.
- Flexibility: By focusing on the logical structure, abstract syntax provides the flexibility to adapt to various concrete syntaxes without changing the underlying semantics of the language.
- Formal Specification
- Graph-Based Representations: Abstract syntax can be formally represented using graphs, where nodes represent elements and edges represent relationships. This approach facilitates automated processing, analysis, and transformation of models.
- Grammars and Algebraic Specifications: Formal languages and algebraic methods are also used to define abstract syntax, providing a rigorous foundation for tool support and model manipulation.
Importance in MDE
- Model Validation: Abstract syntax ensures that models conform to the predefined structure and rules, enabling automated validation and error checking.
- Model Transformation: Abstract syntax is essential for defining model transformations, where models are converted from one form to another while preserving their underlying structure and semantics.
- Tool Interoperability: By adhering to a well-defined abstract syntax, different modeling tools and platforms can interoperate, facilitating model exchange and integration across various environments.
- Customization and Extension: Abstract syntax allows for the customization and extension of modeling languages to suit specific domains or requirements, supporting the creation of domain-specific languages (DSLs).
Historical Context
The concept of abstract syntax has roots in formal language theory and compiler design, where it has been used to define the structure of programming languages and guide the development of compilers and interpreters. In the context of MDE, abstract syntax has become a cornerstone of metamodeling and the development of modeling languages, supported by standards like the Meta-Object Facility (MOF) and tools like the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF).
In summary, abstract syntax provides the foundational structure for modeling languages, ensuring consistency, flexibility, and interoperability in model-driven engineering. It is a critical component that underpins the creation, validation, transformation, and integration of models across diverse domains and application